PUBLISHED IN THE Continental Free Press ON 09-04-2020



Source: snoop4truth 

David Lester Straight recommends using his form “affidavit” to renounce U.S. citizenship so as to avoid application of U.S. laws, U.S. tax obligations and U.S. financial obligations. Straight does not know that his affidavit alone will not work to renounce U.S. citizenship and would not operate to absolve a person of U.S. law, U.S. tax obligations or U.S. financial obligations even if it did work to renounce U.S. citizenship.

In “IN RE YUSKA, Bankr. Court, Iowa 2017″, the court held, ” [The affiant’s] attempt to unilaterally declare himself free of citizenship and its responsibilities WAS … INEFFECTIVE. HE CANNOT CONTINUE TO RESIDE HERE IN THE UNITED STATES AND CONTINUE TO ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF CITIZENSHIP WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY CLAIMING HE IS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN. 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (setting forth the ways a citizen may renounce citizenship). AN AFFIDAVIT PURPORTING TO RENOUNCE CITIZENSHIP IS NOT EFFECTIVE UNDER 8 U.S.C. § 1481, because, among other things, “A THRESHOLD REQUIREMENT UNDER THESE PROCEDURES IS THAT THE CITIZEN BE OUTSIDE THE BORDERS OF THE UNITED STATES in order for his renunciation to take effect.” Duncan v. U.S. Dep’t of State, No. 7:08-CV-00564, 2008 WL 4821323, at *1-2 (W.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2008).”
Further, the law applies exactly the same to citizens as non-citizens, state citizens or non-state citizens, U.S. citizens or non-U.S. citizens, legal aliens and illegal aliens. Status changes nothing whatsoever. puts it this way, “Persons who wish to renounce U.S. citizenship should be aware of the fact that renunciation of U.S. citizenship MAY HAVE NO EFFECT ON THEIR U.S. TAX OR MILITARY SERVICE OBLIGATIONS (contact the Internal Revenue Service or U.S. Selective Service for more information). In addition, THE ACT OF RENOUNCING U.S. CITIZENSHIP DOES NOT ALLOW PERSONS TO AVOID POSSIBLE PROSECUTION FOR CRIMES WHICH THEY MAY HAVE COMMITTED OR MAY COMMIT IN THE FUTURE WHICH VIOLATE U.S. LAW, or escape the repayment of financial obligations, including child support payments, previously incurred in the United States or incurred as United States citizens abroad.”. So, there is no advantage in attempting to renounce U.S. citizenship whatsoever.

The Government of The United States of America maintains in the face of the aforementioned argument  that U.S. citizenship have never legally existed. 

In the following evidence doc from 1790 the status simply reads “citizen of the United States”: 



In the 14th amendment it reads: 

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Constitution of the United States: 

Section. 2.

The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.


So where did the title U.S. citizen status come from and why is it so important to call it U.S. citizenship?

Who knows because there is no such body politic as U.S. congress, U.S. senate, nor U.S. house of representatives nor any constitution in existence that established the aforementioned body politic. This means there is no Federal law in existence that pertains to anyone at the moment unless the matter is settled. 

Why are inhabitants trying to renounce something that does not exist by any constitution in existence in the entire world? 

Where is our U.S. citizen card to prove our status? 

Where do we take an oath or affirmation to obtain the status of U.S. citizen? 

We have asked around and some people claim that U.S. citizen and citizen of the United States are interchangeable however that would be considered hearsay. Every Attorney in existence knows that terms and styles are extremely important when it comes to intent and sueing the responsible party. Go and ask around, the clerks of the counties claim there is no such oath or affirmation in existence to take as a U.S. citizen. 

A birth certificate cannot be used as an identification document to obtain a state id card so the birth certificate is not evidence of U.S. citizenship. The 14th amendment is not evidence of U.S. citizenship. 

Voter registration means that a person registered with a 527 organization, private company, so voter registration is not evidence of U.S. citizenship.  

Status is nothing to take lightly and the Government of The United States of America has already challenged the U.S. on the legitimacy of its existence as a country and has remained silent on the matter and is currently in default.  LINK

Third Party beneficiary: LINK

Lawyers can’t claim a direct benefit nor obligation if the third party was never involved with the original contract. The legal definition only reads the third party may have rights. 

What Is a Third-Party Beneficiary?

A third-party beneficiary is a person or business that benefits from the terms of a contract made between two other parties. In law, a third-party beneficiary may have certain rights that can be enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.

Someone is playing a very cruel trick on the inhabitants and has kidnapped about 330 million persons and no one seems to notice.  

Hereby published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America,