PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 11-29-2017
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE
The whole narrative that somehow a federal by-law is any different from a U.S. state by-law is utterly ridiculous and simply a scam.
Statement: In the case of a federal by-law passing in the form of a bill is done when the representatives of a U.S. state gather in Washington D.C. to pass a by-law. If the states pass a by-law within the state that is contrary to the gathering of the states thereby calling the bill a federal law as if it were separate is notwithstanding due to the fact that the same entities are committing barratry in the creation of the conflict in the first instance. How is there any separation between any made up federal and state by-law when written and voted on by the same offices?
Further, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is under the universal charter of the judge derived from the foreign Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem and therefore any decision coming from any so-called federal judiciary under the aforementioned foreign entity would be without jurisdiction to decide anything outside of the metes and bounds of Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem. LINK
Further, to restrict anyone from owning property regardless of type would be a clear violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with
2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
The committee finds that this arbitrary notice and the contents thereof issued by police Chief Susan Ballard of Honolulu, HawaII is nothing more than a political ploy, on behalf of a foreign country to enforce the laws of a foreign country in an effort to change the political structure of the State of HawaII into a communist and or socialist failure without the vote of the people.
Therefore the notice is null and void for sedition against the principals of the law of nations, will full oppression against her constituency on behalf of a foreign country, and opens for suit against police Chief Susan Ballard of Honolulu, HawaII for violating the most basic human right to own property.
The aforementioned Human Right says nothing about the right of any international entity to restrict anyone from owning certain types of property.
The aforementioned human right is and always has been based on the fact that the human right is absolute so long as the exercise thereof does not violate the human right of another.
If the State of HawaII revised statutes violate basic human rights, that revised statute would be rendered a unlawful order and Susan Ballard does have the right to refuse to follow or enforce said order. The intangible property right to self defense is absolute and the exercise thereof does not violate the human rights of others.
Instead, Susan Ballard chose, in her personal capacity to create a controversy where none exists and accepted the full liable for violating the human rights of all that she personally threatened by listening to a foreign country and its violations of the law of nations. LINK