National Security Breach by creatures of the state!
Published on 02-04-2016 by THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE
Please watch this short clip from CBS News.
Presented by the Government of The United States of America!
Many people have claimed that the No Titles of Nobility clause within each State constitution means that no one is to accept a Title of Nobility from any King or Prince etc…
That may be correct, however the clause within each constitution is not adequate enough for what you are about to see within this presentation.
Famous Quote: “Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance”.‖2 2US vs. Minker. 350 US,179 p187.
We figured out that the constitution cannot enter into any court room because of this clause: “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States; and no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State”.
Many people concentrate on the word “Title” and never look up the word “Nobility”. In order to understand this clause is to look at it in reverse:
NOBILITY. An order of men in several countries to whom privileges are granted at the expense of the rest of the people.
As we have said before, to change an entity is to change its form. The word “State” is not the same as the word “STATE”.
The main issue is whether a man can plead for another in any cause for a fee. When the country first started, this practice was prohibited. Then expanded to “friend in council” where a fee was also prohibited.
Then the practice expanded to where someone could plead for a entity and represent it. Then the corporation became a natural person under definition. Then it became the practice to plead for the individual. This happened over many years by statute, not by any constitution. The practice is called “Creatures of statute (also known as creatures of the state) are legal entities, such as corporations, created by statute”.
Creatures of statute may include municipalities and other artificial legal entities or relationships.[1] Thus, when a statute in some fashion requires the formation of a corporate body—often for governmental purposes—such bodies when formed are known as “creatures of statute.”
The same concept is also expressed with the phrase “creature of the state.
The term “creature of statute” is most common to the United States.
Many people already know that the UNITED STATES is not the same as the United States. So, that would mean that the UNITED STATES is a creature of statute.
The importance of a corporate body, regardless of its exact function, when such a body is a creature of statute is that its active functions can only be within the scope detailed by the statute which created that corporation.
Thereby, the creature of statute is the tangible manifestation of the functions or work described by a given statute. The jurisdiction of a body that is a creature of statute is also therefore limited to the functional scope written into the laws that created that body. Unlike most (private) corporate bodies, creatures of statute cannot expand their business interests into other diverse areas.
This means that if the creature has within it Attorney’s fees, then it is required to pay attorney’s fees. If the creature has within the statute that persons can be represented which is implied by the term Attorney’s fees, then we know that the constitution did not authorize its creation and therefore has been created by a privileged class of people?
Example:
The U.S. state of Florida is a creature of statute and not the state itself therefore the creature is represented by a prosecutor that is a member of the bar and paid a fee for the representation of the creature of the state created by statute and not authorized by the State of Florida constitution itself.
Further, an ENACTMENT CLAUSE IN THE NAME OF THE CREATURE is for the creature itself and not an enactment of the state.
Example: “Be It enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:“ now what happens when you do this: “BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA”
You changed the enactment clause by statute and placed the creature under a title in the name of “STATE OF FLORIDA OR FL”.
This clause is a part of the statute which indicates the legislative authority by which the statute is made and its effective date. Some state constitutions specify the enacting clause for legislation, and such legislation becomes void without the enacting clause. Generally, enacting clauses appear in historical or legislative notes in codifications of statutes.
Whoops, Some state constitutions specify the enacting clause for legislation, and such legislation becomes void without the enacting clause.
What could this mean? Could it mean that a creature of statute was created on paper? Could it mean that all statutes created under another ENACTING CLAUSE could be for the benefit of a privileged class of people and no one else?
The Lawyers never accepted any titles of nobility. What they did was create a nobility under a title using a creature of statute thereby never accepting a foreign title. There was not any clause in any constitution that forbids creating a nobility under a title/creature created by statute. However, there is a law that forbids creating a STATE within a state which is what the lawyers violated.
The STATE was created on paper and therefore is a mere image of the original state, however has real life applications and consequences in its enforcement.
Now does this famous quote make sense now?
“Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance”.‖2 2US vs. Minker. 350 US,179 p187.
The state constitutions do not recognize anyone pleading for another in any court case because people have a right to face their accuser, not their agent. That is why constitutions are not allowed in any court because it null and voids the lawyers within the court trying to practice law which is not recognized by the state constitutions nor any constitution of the United States of America.
The people are not recognized as having access to any state constitution because they are without an oath or affirmation to it and are considered denizen and banished from the state. The Statutes at Large for the State of South Carolina:
Oath or affirmation to the State equals immunity from the lawyers courts and STATUTES under THEIR TITLE, STATE OF FLORIDA of which they have created a NOBILITY under a title within a State for themselves at the expense of the people. The expense that is being spent is the respect that the people have for the law itself while deceived into respecting the appearance of law for the benefit of a privileged class of people.
The privileged class of people, through their devises have enforced the homelessness of millions of people through their creatures of statute and boast of running the country and making its laws to benefit a privileged few in front of the view of the public. Therefore through their De-stablization and multiple human rights violations have declared themselves a National Security risk and therefore have knowingly and willfully caused the National Security Breach and contempt of every constitution and the Articles of Confederation of 1781 and as amended August 5th, 2015.
Presented by the Government of The United States of America!
02-04-2016
12654324_994359363964580_5788167796616633440_n