The Global Compact on Migration violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights!
PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 11-22-2018
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE
MEP Marcel de Graaff had a press conference speaking out against the Global Compact on Migration and how it expands the definition of hate speech to include the political crime of criticizing immigration, more can be heard here:
The mere offer of a Global Compact on Migration that has any speech classified as hate speech in it is a complete violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights namely: Link!
“Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
It appears that the real intent of the Global Compact on Immigration is to silence witnesses against the war crimes being perpetrated by a Global Political Party that are perpetrating the war crimes; thereby attacking civilians with military forces disguised as migrants to conceal the fact that “migrants” are literally militants hired to sneak into countries under the cover of real immigration laws and start terror cells ready to attack at anytime the order comes down from the Political Party responsible. Migrant Caravans are used to weaken a political opponent in a Global Chess Game by exhausting the resources of the political opponent wherein human needs are used to manipulate the political opponent out of valuable supplies that could otherwise be used to strengthen ones own country. This is called forced association:
“Article 20.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.”
1: Why is anyone being forced into association with Hondurans and the problems of Honduras? They are all adults and have the capacity to think and solve problems.
2: Why is Europe and America being forced into an association with Islam by Vatican City?
Association is by choice in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It appears that there is a group of people that were never taught boundaries as children and believe that the worlds problems fall on their shoulders which is the road to communism in all their forms. To compel association is a violation of:
Article 4.
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Whenever international crimes are occurring, and there is an attempt to silence the witnesses on the international level under political crimes, there is always a perpetrator attempting to hide real international crimes being committed against people within foreign sovereign countries or against foreign sovereign countries. International political parties can not exist internationally that has any standing anywhere because only sovereign countries can form political parties. Political Parties must have boundaries to exist otherwise their existence without borders causes international criminal trespass against other political parties thereby violating the convention on political and civil rights.
The term “Hate Speech” was created as a political crime thereby attempting to create a international political party that cannot exist without violating the basic principals of the Charter of the United Nations. Supra National organizations cannot create their own political party and impose their politics on the countries they voluntarily exiled from their persons. Those global and or international political parties can only impose its laws on its members under private international law otherwise violate forced association.
Globalism and world government has been tried over and over in history and has always failed because it is impossible to implement. No one can convince billions of people of something that does not make any sense.
It is complete idiocy to attempt to coin the phrase “hate Speech” under political crimes that were not adopted by all political parties within their spheres. Any attempt to manipulate other political parties through violent and coercive means is the definition of terrorism whereby a criminal trespass has occurred and therefore classified as terrorism. Imposing the political term “Hate Speech” created by one political party cannot be prosecuted and enforced upon other political parties otherwise violate the neutrality of a judicial branch of a government and the absolute political rights of members of another political party.
Published by the committee of the National assembly for the Government of The United States of America.
11-22-2018