Barnstable district court ignores clear evidence of pedophilia!
PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 09-27-2017 INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE
The Barnstable District Court is ignoring clear evidence of child molestation in a particular case wherein the people of Cape Cod have been demonizing the mother for the last couple of years through the Cape Cod Times. We all know how these higher class societies believe they can always provide a better life for children when in fact what they are doing is burying some serious evidence that is published in this International Public Notice with express permission from Shannon Reckner, the mother.
Judge Hand as seen here:
was handed off a case by Arthur C. Ryley for Barnstable County Probate and Family Court judge LINK when the case somehow turned into a parental kidnapping case against the mother Shannon Reckner, that reported the molestation to a New York court and was able to obtain a protection order there.
The probation officer keeps repeating that that their office has never seen anything like what is going on in this case.
Shannon Reckner was first alarmed when she saw this in her sons diaper: WARNING, FOLLOWING IMAGES ARE GRAPHIC.
The first two pictures were taken the second time that there was blood in the feces and Shannon thought to start documenting what was happening to her son and what she found when her son came back from visiting his father.
According to Shannon Reckner in an interview today reported that her son said the following in the back of their car which sparked the immediate hospital visit and the court proceedings in New York etc….
Quote: The sons dad called and wanted to talk to his son, when the phone was handed to his son the boy said. “Daddy, I no talk to you, I hang up now”. Shannon was shocked because he had never said anything like that before. Shannon asked her son why he did not want to talk to daddy and her son said: “Daddy stuck his tail in my bum and we go up and down” he was then asked Where does daddy do this? and her son said, in daddy’s bed on daddy’s lap, we play chu chu train. end quote
The Human Rights Defenders International have asked all of the questions that needed to be asked in this case such as why did you not report this when you saw blood in his feces the first time, why did you wait two weeks? Shannon responded with, I was in shock and had a case of denial that this type of thing was happening too my son, I don’t think anyone is prepared for this when it happens to their children. I acted when I realized there was a pattern and who was responsible. I took it to court with the documented evidence and got a protective order against the father. The politics started when the Barnsable family court judge called the New York Judge directly without any hearing and took jurisdiction over the case. That is when my life took a turn for the worse and has never been the same since.”
The Human Rights Defenders will have to admit, they did not believe Shannon Reckner at first, based on the reports filed in the case by all of the agencies involved, and needed hard evidence of some kind of abuse before moving forward on this case. Further, the Human Rights Defenders did not want to start false accusations against a father, based on empty allegations of a mother that has an ankle bracelet on from the court and is being treated like she is on probation but the Judge is saying that Shannon Reckner is not on probation yet she has an ankle bracelet on her?????
There are a lot of unanswered questions in this case as to why this evidence is not being allowed in the case file. Why is the mother being withheld from seeing her son when she had full custody at the time when he was taken to Florida and where Shannon was arrested on her way back? If a parent is kidnapping their son, why bring him back when she did not know there was a warrant out for her for parental kidnapping? We could go on and on but the readers of this publication of record can see what is going on with this brief description of the case.
The son has been with his father for the past two OR three years and was awarded full custody and Shannon Reckner was told to stop making false accusations against the father or she will never see her son again. It appears that the people of Cape Cod Massachusetts have made good on their threat.
The people of Cape Cod have a lot to answer for in this case because the people of Cape Cod are ultimately responsible. This morning, Judge Hand continues her denial of any evidence of this kind against the father to be filed in her court and remains unreasonable. Judge Hand also refuses to allow the Universal Declaration of Human rights and the rights of the child to be entered into her court and displays the highest contempt for any form of evidence that may come against the father in this case. When has that ever happened anywhere in America especially in a child custody case or child abuse cases? Those actions by Judge Hand alone would tell anyone that there is something wrong here.
Notice: THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST WILL REMOVE THIS PUBLICATION OF RECORD FROM THE INTERNET WHEN THIS EVIDENCE IS ALLOWED AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF BLACK EYES AND CUTS ON THIS BOYS HEAD ARE FILED AND DUE PROCESS IS RESTORED. THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST IS WELL AWARE OF THE SEVERITY OF THIS CASE AND WILL TAKE PRECAUTIONS THAT THIS LITTLE BOY DOES NOT GET LABELED FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE BY REMOVING THIS PUBLICATION FROM THE INTERNET, BUT NOT FROM THE RECORD, AS SOON AS JUSTICE IS DONE.
2 Replies to “Barnstable district court ignores clear evidence of pedophilia!”
Name: T Krupa
Comment: I am writing concerning your article Barnstable court ignores. I can’t believe you would publish something like this without getting both sides of the story. I know the person who wrote this. She used to be my neighbor. I saw how she was with her son. She provoked him to say things. The reason the courts aren’t doing anything is because there was never any evidence brought before the judge proving the father has abuse his son. As for the bruises, he was a 3 year old boy, who enjoyed playing outside. Bruises happen! My own kids have them, they aren’t abused!!! Please remove this article, as it isn’t fair, unless you get all your facts. Not just that of the mother,a clear sociopath, who belongs in a mental hospital, not in the court system fighting for custody of her son. Her son is were he belongs, with a family who loves him! He has a stable life right now. Why would the courts want to take that away from him?
Concerned for a kid
Hello T Krupa,
THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST (hereinafter “newspaper”) shares your concern for the welfare of children. The article in question does not mention the child’s name nor does it mention the father’s name nor is there a full picture of the child’s face in the article. All the article mentions is the judge, her picture and the woman that brought the evidence forward to this newspaper.
When that article was published, the case was immediately moved to a different venue. The American Herald did receive some derogatory comments that were never published that we believe were from the father of the child, our belief does not constitute the publication of those derogatory comments, however they were directly aimed at the mother. The father’s name was never mentioned in the article.
The newspaper is not the story. Publishing a story is done carefully so that the newspaper does not become the story. The newspaper does not discard evidence due to its code of ethics. This newspaper did not believe nor had reason to believe that the evidence was doctored or fabricated. This newspaper is also very aware of how people feel about the woman that requested its publication. Everyone has a voice and a say when it comes to their children regardless of the opinions of others.
The newspaper did read the whole case and the particular evidence that was published was not within the case file and the mother stated that the evidence was in fact presented to the judge which sparked the publication of the evidence. If the evidence that was published was in fact in the case file, the newspaper would not have had anything to publish. If the evidence was missing, it would be irresponsible for the newspaper to ignore the evidence and also make the newspaper liable for hiding evidence according to its code of ethics. The newspaper does not remove publications of record in violation of its own code of ethics.
If one of the courts in that jurisdiction did in fact enter the evidence into the case file, the outcome of the hearing will be published in this newspaper. Simply attempting to quash evidence without any hearing is a crime and therefore the publication will remain until all evidence is entered into a public trial and a hearing and determination is published by that court that held the hearing.